What capability do you want added or improved?
I'd like to know if there is risk that the server could be affected by a too-complex SPARQL query. If so, take a look at this approach to minimizing the exposure of the SPARQL servers. http://linkeddatafragments.org (Paul Alexander has vetted this approach with some of his colleagues.)
Where do you want this capability to be accessible?
To be determined.
What sort of input/command mechanism do you want?
What is the desired output (content, format, location)? Other details of your desired capability? What version of the product are you using? Please provide any additional information below (particular ontology/ies, text contents of vocabulary (voc2rdf), operating system, browser/version (Firefox, Safari, IE, etc.), screenshot, etc.)
From jbgrayb...@mindspring.com on January 19, 2015 20:41:55
What capability do you want added or improved? I'd like to know if there is risk that the server could be affected by a too-complex SPARQL query. If so, take a look at this approach to minimizing the exposure of the SPARQL servers. http://linkeddatafragments.org (Paul Alexander has vetted this approach with some of his colleagues.)
Where do you want this capability to be accessible? To be determined.
What sort of input/command mechanism do you want?
What is the desired output (content, format, location)? Other details of your desired capability? What version of the product are you using? Please provide any additional information below (particular ontology/ies, text contents of vocabulary (voc2rdf), operating system, browser/version (Firefox, Safari, IE, etc.), screenshot, etc.)
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/mmisw/issues/detail?id=336