Closed YunseokJANG closed 4 years ago
Your initial pull request was actually wrong - I should have double checked. This one is, too.
See the CI/CD for this in
abbreviating for visibility
- r2plus1d_34_clip8_ig65m_from_scratch.pkl --classes 487
- r2plus1d_34_clip8_ft_kinetics_from_ig65m.pkl --classes 400
- r2plus1d_34_clip32_ig65m_from_scratch.pkl --classes 359
- r2plus1d_34_clip32_ft_kinetics_from_ig65m.pkl --classes 400
Can you make a pull request
changing the wording from
Models fine-tuned on Kinetics have 400 classes, the plain IG65 models 487 (32 clips), and 359 (8 clips) classes.
to
Models fine-tuned on Kinetics have 400 classes, the plain IG65 models 487 (8 clips), and 359 (32 clips) classes.
Thanks!
Oh, I changed but by replacing the numbers. Do you want to flip that order?
Perfect, thanks!
Hi, @daniel-j-h
I now tried with 'r2plus1d_34_32_ig65m' model with 487 classes (after this pull request https://github.com/moabitcoin/ig65m-pytorch/pull/30 ), but I failed with an assert. I think either this part, or the description in README (see below) is incorrect:
Models fine-tuned on Kinetics have 400 classes, the plain IG65 models 487 (32 clips), and 359 (8 clips) classes.
Please check the output dimension and make some appropriate changes.
Regards,