Closed unndreay closed 4 years ago
The test for investment optimization reveals that tabular's Facade._investment()
method has to be adapted as well:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/unndreay/Workspaces/oemo-flex/tests/run_test.py", line 6, in <module>
test_facades.check_asymmetric_storage_optimize_investment()
File "/home/unndreay/Workspaces/oemo-flex/tests/test_facades.py", line 168, in check_asymmetric_storage_optimize_investment
initial_storage_level=0, # oemof.solph argument
File "/home/unndreay/Workspaces/oemo-flex/oemoflex/facades.py", line 67, in __init__
self.build_solph_components()
File "/home/unndreay/Workspaces/oemo-flex/oemoflex/facades.py", line 79, in build_solph_components
self.investment = self._investment()
File "/home/unndreay/Workspaces/oemof-tabular/src/oemof/tabular/facades.py", line 91, in _investment
if self.capacity_cost is None:
AttributeError: 'AsymmetricStorage' object has no attribute 'capacity_cost'
See https://github.com/oemof/oemof-tabular/blob/master/src/oemof/tabular/facades.py#L84-L91
Chosen tech type name with a space to be in line with techs "electrical line" and "electrical bus".
Open todo: Clean up the tests.
This introduces an asymmetric storage derived from tabular 'Storage'.
Asymmetric means, that each the charging and the discharging device can be parametrized different.