Just a small fix on dtype reclassification when creating a Raster object.
I was also tempted to reclassify float as FLOAT64 and int as INT64 because based on my quick search, Python's float is represented as 64-bit, and int is pretty much unbounded. But then maybe these might be intended for optimization purposes as FLOAT32 and INT32 are practically sufficient in most cases.
Just a small fix on dtype reclassification when creating a
Rasterobject.I was also tempted to reclassify
floatasFLOAT64andintasINT64because based on my quick search, Python'sfloatis represented as 64-bit, andintis pretty much unbounded. But then maybe these might be intended for optimization purposes asFLOAT32andINT32are practically sufficient in most cases.