Just a small fix on dtype reclassification when creating a Raster object.
I was also tempted to reclassify float as FLOAT64 and int as INT64 because based on my quick search, Python's float is represented as 64-bit, and int is pretty much unbounded. But then maybe these might be intended for optimization purposes as FLOAT32 and INT32 are practically sufficient in most cases.
Just a small fix on dtype reclassification when creating a
Raster
object.I was also tempted to reclassify
float
asFLOAT64
andint
asINT64
because based on my quick search, Python'sfloat
is represented as 64-bit, andint
is pretty much unbounded. But then maybe these might be intended for optimization purposes asFLOAT32
andINT32
are practically sufficient in most cases.