We yet have support for "ortholog-phenotype" associations implemented by populating our solr index with subject_ortholog_closure, before we implement that, it's worth considering whether it would make more sense to create edges with appropriate modeling.
and perhaps some roll-up to an UPHENO or HP term? we don't have any direct edge for that currently that I can tell.
We would want to create an association that allows the original to be fully reconstructed
subject: HGNC:8616
[subject_qualifier? original_subject? subject_ortholog_qualifier?]: ZFIN:ZDB-GENE-990415-8
predicate: biolink:has_phenotype [too strong of an assertion? how do we say 'via orthology'?]
object: [UPHENO or HP term that is an appropriate replacement?]
[object_qualifier? original_object? subject_phenlog_qualifier?]: ZP:0000032
We should probably discuss this on a data call first, then a biolink modeling call?
We yet have support for "ortholog-phenotype" associations implemented by populating our solr index with subject_ortholog_closure, before we implement that, it's worth considering whether it would make more sense to create edges with appropriate modeling.
Given
plus
and perhaps some roll-up to an UPHENO or HP term? we don't have any direct edge for that currently that I can tell.
We would want to create an association that allows the original to be fully reconstructed
We should probably discuss this on a data call first, then a biolink modeling call?
cc: @putmantime @cmungall @monicacecilia @mbrush @sierra-moxon