Mapping: Mappings are suggested to Mondo term which already have a exact mapping to another term of the same source

[sabrinatoro]

From unmapped_doid_lex.tsv (230930)

Some DO terms are mapped to a Mondo term even though the Mondo term already has an exact match to another DO term. This is probably due to a difference in lumping/splitting in DO and Mondo. I don't know that we can do something about this, but the 2 options would be: 1) do not map to MONDO terms that already have a DO equivalent 2) report the Mondo terms that are in this new mapping file but already have a DO equivalent (that will help curators with the review)

At the end of the day, I think this is an indication that a curator should review the synonyms and the existing mapping. This is not a problem with the mapping itself, just an issue that is data related and therefore requires curator attention (and if we could make it easier to bring curator attention to this, that would be helpful).

Examples:

subject_id	subject_label	object_id	predicate_id	object_label	mapping_justification	mapping_tool	confidence	subject_match_field	object_match_field	match_string
MONDO:0008048	autosomal dominant centronuclear myopathy	DOID:0111223	MONDO:equivalentTo	centronuclear myopathy 1	semapv:LexicalMatching	oaklib	0.8	oio:hasExactSynonym	rdfs:label	centronuclear myopathy type 1
MONDO:0007648	hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma	DOID:0080764	MONDO:equivalentTo	hereditary diffuse gastric cancer	semapv:LexicalMatching	oaklib	0.8	oio:hasExactSynonym	rdfs:label	hereditary diffuse gastric cancer
MONDO:0009959	peroxisome biogenesis disorder type 3B	DOID:0081241	MONDO:equivalentTo	peroxisome biogenesis disorder 3B	semapv:LexicalMatching	oaklib	0.8497788952	rdfs:label	rdfs:label	peroxisome biogenesis disorder type 3b

[matentzn]

Excellent analysis. Lets discuss on QC call!