Open thw0rted opened 1 week ago
In short, calling update with a where selector that does not match an existing record, is supposed to throw an exception indicating that the required record was not found. Instead, Prismock returns null.
update
where
Simple repro here, with thanks to @paulsouche for the starter.
ETA: forgot to mention this would be fixed by #1105.
In short, calling
updatewith awhereselector that does not match an existing record, is supposed to throw an exception indicating that the required record was not found. Instead, Prismock returns null.Simple repro here, with thanks to @paulsouche for the starter.
ETA: forgot to mention this would be fixed by #1105.