Closed himynamesdave closed 2 months ago
I think incorrectly we had a arango_cti_processor_note option in CLI. This should be removed from the code -- the script automatically assigns _arango_cti_processor_note property
arango_cti_processor_note
See here for context: https://github.com/muchdogesec/arango_cti_processor/commit/2f7f0a9a9e1ad2e47b47285f036f1b76302d0af8
We should however allow user to enter stix2arango_note via the CLI, which is used with the stix2arango when arango_cti_processor objects are generated
I think incorrectly we had a
arango_cti_processor_note
option in CLI. This should be removed from the code -- the script automatically assigns _arango_cti_processor_note propertySee here for context: https://github.com/muchdogesec/arango_cti_processor/commit/2f7f0a9a9e1ad2e47b47285f036f1b76302d0af8
We should however allow user to enter stix2arango_note via the CLI, which is used with the stix2arango when arango_cti_processor objects are generated