Open gsture opened 1 week ago
We've somewhat been able to reproduce the issue. Does the performance change if you select another relay or is it roughly the same?
We've somewhat been able to reproduce the issue. Does the performance change if you select another relay or is it roughly the same?
It's practically all the same.
Here is Frankfurt:
Even 40gbit malmo server does not go higher:
Both servers reach 800+ on desktop.
Side note: I don't expect to always reach 800mbit+, it's really awesome and i don't think many vpn providers offer this kind of throughput but this report is just about the throughput difference between desktop and mobile client.
Thanks for the clarification. 🙏 If you are able to test if the Wireguard yeilds the same performance or better it would be of great help. https://download.wireguard.com/android-client/ Otherwise we'll do it when we look closer into this issue. You can create a scannable QR-code for the wireguard profile under WireGuard configuration by generating a new device and then selecting a configuration.
Is it a bug?
I have checked if others have reported this already
Current Behavior
I want to report that the mobile client is having much lower throughput then expected. I tried to change the MTU but that didn't make a difference. I know that some phones might have some cpu limitations but the CPU does not seem to throttle while doing these speed tests. I also did the same test on a 5 year old Samsung S10 and speeds where about the same.
Phone (WIFI) with VPN:
Expected Behavior
Phone (WIFI) without vpn:
Laptop (ethernet) without vpn:
Laptop (ethernet) with vpn:
Android version
GrapheneOS 15 (AP3A.241005.015)
Device model
2 x Pixel 8 & Samsung S10
Mullvad VPN app version
2024.8
Additional Information