Check if another player has the same serial

[Nico8340]

This pull request adds a check when connecting to ensure that players can't use the same serial, thus preventing abuses related to serial manipulation, such as for example, when they try to spoof a server's moderator's serial as their own, while they're connected to the server.

The change involved the addition of a new parameter called check_duplicate_serials which allows turning off the feature for development and testing servers to connect with virtual machines.

The new code is: CD50 The new description is: Serial already in use

[Xenius97]

This solution is not perfect because if you run multiple MTA clients on one machine (VM), you get the same serial, making localhost testing impossible.

[Xenius97]

Maybe you could add something like check_double_serials to server settings enabled by default.

[Nico8340]

This solution is not perfect because if you run multiple MTA clients on one machine (VM), you get the same serial, making localhost testing impossible.

I forgot about that, thanks for reminding. If anyone has any ideas, feel free to share them.

[Nico8340]

Maybe you could add something like check_double_serials to server settings enabled by default.

Good idea, I look forward to other people's opinions as well

[Fernando-A-Rocha]

This solution is not perfect because if you run multiple MTA clients on one machine (VM), you get the same serial, making localhost testing impossible.

I forgot you can use VMs to run multiple MTA clients. You need 1 VM (os) per client right?

[Nico8340]

This solution is not perfect because if you run multiple MTA clients on one machine (VM), you get the same serial, making localhost testing impossible.

I forgot you can use VMs to run multiple MTA clients. You need 1 VM (os) per client right?

That's right

[Fernando-A-Rocha]

Maybe you could add something like check_double_serials to server settings enabled by default.

Maybe we can have a setting like allow_unverified_clients that is a more generic name

[G-Moris]

Would this be optimized if 'std::unordered_map' and 'find' were used instead of a loop?

[Nico8340]

Would this be optimized if 'std::unordered_map' and 'find' were used instead of a loop?

In fact, in this use case there are no significant differences in terms of average server sizes, but for a larger search operation it is really better to use unordered_map and its method. If someone wants to refactor it, they have to modify the entire class, and this pull request is not intended for that.

[lopezloo]

when they try to spoof a server's moderator's serial as their own

How would they know server's moderator serial?

[Nico8340]

How would they know server's moderator serial?

From servers with a loophole or a data leak