musesum
commented
2 months ago Most likely follow AudioKit’s trajectory. I think they were Apache, but seems now to be MIT. Will look into it.
On Mar 31, 2024, at 11:47 PM, David J. Kordsmeier @.***> wrote:
Hi - it would be great if you could add a license file to this project and dependent projects. While the selection is up to you, a permissive academic license is great (MIT, Apache, BSD). If you prefer GPL copyleft licenses, a dual license is most flexible if you would like to engage in an approach for commercialization (with GPL + commercial license options you can be assured nobody can run off with anything without contributing back any source they distribute, and most real corporate lawyers would block GPLv2+ use in anything distributed for profit). If you are the sole contributor you will always have control over licensing decisions (including changing your mind about the license). I look forward to trying out the software and I am willing to contribute back what I can. Personally I put most of my non-customer work under Apache, BSD-3 clause, or MIT/X. I'd rather see more people using software than having to get lawyers to review if it is possible.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/musesum/DeepMuse/issues/1, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACHBTZECGXFRPKBQI7M2ILY3D7I3AVCNFSM6AAAAABFRFA2AWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGIYTONRVGMYTOMQ. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
truedat101
Hi - it would be great if you could add a license file to this project and dependent projects. While the selection is up to you, a permissive academic license is great (MIT, Apache, BSD). If you prefer GPL copyleft licenses, a dual license is most flexible if you would like to engage in an approach for commercialization (with GPL + commercial license options you can be assured nobody can run off with anything without contributing back any source they distribute, and most real corporate lawyers would block GPLv2+ use in anything distributed for profit). If you are the sole contributor you will always have control over licensing decisions (including changing your mind about the license). I look forward to trying out the software and I am willing to contribute back what I can. Personally I put most of my non-customer work under Apache, BSD-3 clause, or MIT/X. I'd rather see more people using software than having to get lawyers to review if it is possible.