mykelalvis / pojosr

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/pojosr
0 stars 0 forks source link

Release a new version that supports OSGi 4.3 #5

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Could you guys please cut a release that supports OSGi 4.3 spec.

And also consider doing more frequent releases of this wonderful library.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 11:49

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
0.1.8 should have some support for 4.3 - it bundles the 4.3 api and provides 
some adapt() things. 

Could you please be a bit more specific in what you are missing?

Original comment by karlpauls on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
You did a commit
http://code.google.com/p/pojosr/source/detail?r=60

Would be good to have a release with this included.

Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Ok, this commit is part of 0.1.8. 

I'm sorry for the mess of that release with the framework saying it is 
0.1.7-SNAPSHOT and the tag commit saying it is 0.1.9-SNAPSHOT but the released 
artifact (and the 0.1.8 tag) are version 0.1.8 and should include the 4.3 
support. 

Please let me know if that doesn't work for you.

Original comment by karlpauls on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Perfect for me

And no worries about the version number. It just makes end users a bit unease 
when they see a SNAPSHOT in use.

Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:35

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I suggest you then close your open tickets which has been resolved and mark it 
as fixed in the versions that matches it.

Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
I guess I can do this. Sorry for the mixup. 

Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Ah maybe not. I dont see a way to close this ticket.

Original comment by claus.ib...@gmail.com on 25 Oct 2012 at 1:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Yeah, the issue management is not perfect. I'm sorry for the confusion. This is 
added in 0.1.8.

Original comment by karlpauls on 25 Oct 2012 at 2:21