Closed Waldz closed 5 years ago
Should it go to the https://github.com/mysteriumnetwork/wallet?
Should it go to the https://github.com/mysteriumnetwork/wallet?
Yes it's in this wallet
repo.
We are looking for way to simplify way how User gets free tokens for Wallet operations: Allowance Register, Topup Wiwdraw, ClearPromise.
Currently user has to leave online Wallet and go to 2 different Fauceting chats. We are longoking for ways to stay on Wallet and do buttons clicks there.
Now geting free tokens is complex:
users goes to online Wallet
if Localnet: ETH is Minted in Wallet
if Testnet: ETH is Fauceted by bot chats (Twiter, Metamask)
if Localnet: MYST is Minted in Wallet
if Testnet: MYST is Minted in Wallet
@zolia @interro @shroomist please correct if I am wrong somethere.
it's definitely possible to mint tokens on testnet via our walletx interface, without using the telegram bot, thus simplifying the flow. I also agree with @soffokl that this issue belongs in wallet repo, not node.
I wrote what its not possible to mint ETH, just Faucet them
yea, you should mine the testnet eth
Actually it's possible to Mint ETH also:
Let’s get the terms straight — that’s not minting, that’s an airdrop. Term minting implies that no work is done
This task is about to create function for contract owner to mint tokens on testnet/locanet. @Waldz @shroomist you are discussing about different task, about minting tokens for user.
Yes minting for owner is good. But just a small improovement.
Lets:
As a developer In order to make MYST minting on Devnet and Testnet easier and faster I want to have MYST minting in mysterium's Wallet website
Acceptance criteria: