When doing getTransactionInfo( tId ) - getting unhandled rejection:
UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: TypeError: Cannot read property 'data' of undefined
at get (path\node_modules\node-qiwi-api\lib\asyncApi.js:724:34)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)
at async init (path\index.js:101:13)
Which goes from this fn:
async function get(options) {
options.headers = headers;
try {
var result = await axios.get(options.url, options);
console.log(result)
if (result.data.errorCode != undefined)
throw result.data;
return result.data;
}
catch (error) {
throw error.response.data;
}
}
However if we check error object getting into catch part - it's completely normal response, with fields:
errorCode: 0,
error: null
So the error in comparing 0 with undefined, getting true here, then throwing error.
Line 718
The fix would be like this:
if (result.data.errorCode) {
//
}
When it's 0 (false) it won't trigger if.
Any other err code will.
or
if (result.data.error != null) {
//
}
Same error check method is used in lines
736
754
771
788
Also comparisons like this
error.message != undefined
on lines
703
677
May also cause problem at some point ( or at least it's senseless, because of the same reason described above )
Despite I didn't get any missthrows on these lines by now,
I recommend you to look into them more closely and probably change the same way.
When doing getTransactionInfo( tId ) - getting unhandled rejection:
Which goes from this fn:
However if we check error object getting into catch part - it's completely normal response, with fields:
So the error in comparing 0 with undefined, getting true here, then throwing error. Line 718 The fix would be like this:
When it's 0 (false) it won't trigger if. Any other err code will.
or
Same error check method is used in lines 736 754 771 788
Also comparisons like this
error.message != undefined
on lines 703 677
May also cause problem at some point ( or at least it's senseless, because of the same reason described above )
Despite I didn't get any missthrows on these lines by now, I recommend you to look into them more closely and probably change the same way.