indrgun
commented
8 years ago HI Akhaku,
I am interested in your suggested issue. Our use case is similar such that I image we have several Jenkins Job #1 each configured with the plugin to poll from a Git/Stash repository. They in turn will trigger 1 instance of Jenkins Sanity Job that takes the PR information as parameters from Jenkins Job #1. We want the Sanity Job #2 to does the clone, run sanity test and report back to Stash to indicate whether it fails or passes.
I guess I want Sanity to post the comment back to Stash about the start of Sanity, and Sanity completion.
nemccarthy
For cases where we have an alternate method of reporting the result of a build, it would be nice to suppress the stash-pullrequest-builder-plugin build comments. My use case: I have a script that is triggered by a jenkins job, which comments back on the PR with the result of a javascript lint. The comments from this plugin are unnecessary noise at that point - there are probably other cases where this is applicable, too.
I can put up a PR for this myself - let me know if you think this is a desirable feature? It would be configurable in jenkins, and the suppression would be opt-in.