Closed mikhail-sakhnov closed 2 months ago
@Omrigan as we discussed, I added the comment with HTML report link
@bayandin I resolved your notices about adding comment and dropping default value for pull_requests:
node.
I added the comment with HTML report link
Are you talking about this comment https://github.com/neondatabase/autoscaling/pull/1043#issuecomment-2317465793? Should we upload this report to S3 to make it easier to view? And probably having a single comment would be a bit more tidy
@Omrigan @bayandin I merged the comments into a single comment. Speaking about the S3, I created infra issue to set up the credentials for this repo, but it will be triaged next Monday and not clear how much time will it take for the actual work on the issue. What if we merge with the artifacts based report and once all the aws authorization bits and pieces are in place, change the workflow to use s3 again? Another option is to just leave PR here for a while in the open state
@Omrigan @bayandin folks, it stores the report in S3 now
Impacted Packages | Coverage Δ | :robot: |
---|---|---|
github.com/neondatabase/autoscaling/pkg/util | 17.86% (+1.59%) | :thumbsup: |
Add
fgrosse/go-coverage-report@v1.0.2
step to render coverage diff report on PRs