Closed chaporgin closed 1 week ago
Are we OK with versioning this as neondatabase/cluster-autoscaler-neonvm:k8s-1.28-2024-10-07?
I think that's fine. Although if I was going to be super nitpicky I'd love if we had our own version as part of the tag like CA-0.1-k8s-128-api but that's basically bikeshedding
I'd love if we had our own version as part of the tag like CA-0.1-k8s-128-api
Noted about the version format, I will apply it in the next iterations, if any will take place.
This changes the version of cluster autoscaler from tag
cluster-autoscaler-1.27.8
to branchcluster-autoscaler-release-1.28
, commit10a229ac17ea8049248d1c3ce2923b94a4f9085c
. Motivation:We get an occasional error in Azure:
CA seems to have fixed that with recent versions by switching to the
cloud-provider-azure package
, which has a callback to reread the JWT token when needed. This is already present in thecluster-autoscaler-release-1.28
branch, but it is not present in thecluster-autoscaler-1.28.6
tag that I used previously in https://github.com/neondatabase/autoscaling/commit/26d39a6beea7c0921069e53f512bdf962bb26545. Instead, in this branch, the code reads JWT from the filesystem only once and does not consider that AKS will occasionally replace it.Are we OK with versioning this as
neondatabase/cluster-autoscaler-neonvm:k8s-1.28-2024-10-07
?https://github.com/neondatabase/cloud/issues/18284