Closed ransona closed 3 years ago
It should be zero based, but is now not aligned to any particular stimulus onset, as we discussed before it might be easier to just have a continuous signal going out both the photodiode and Harp outputs.
This does mean however there is no trial information on the synchronization pulse, which might make it more difficult for certain types of analyses. This could be mitigated by logging the absolute frame timestamp when trials are initiated using the start trial command. Is that what you had in mind?
EDIT: Actually the current trial index is logged in the continuous file, but is not currently aligned to stimulus onset or timeline presentation, it is simply marking when rig.experiment(meta)
was received by the rig. I could probably adjust it so the increment coincides with either first intended update or first intended frame render.
I think we need to discuss this to make sure we get it right as this is really critical to getting a fully working version, and I'm struggling to explain/understand 100% clearly what's needed here.
For a start: if you imagine our NI DAQ, which is storing the microscope frame pulses and timing pulses from bonvision - can you see what the method would be to know on our DAQs timescale when each trial was intended to start (note: not when it did start, as I understand there can be a dropped frame)? i.e. if we had a grating which should come on at t=0 secs and go off at t=1 secs, how do we know which microscope frames to look at?
I see the frame events file allows us to know in Bonvision time (correct?) when the sync pulse edges are, but I don't now see where we can find in the same timescale when each trial should have started... I thought this was in the 4th column of FrameEvents but from what you say above it seems not?
Anyway, I think best to have a quick chat? Any chance we could do that in the next few hrs?
I think this should be solved now with the new logging structure.
We use the trial number column in the Frames file to know the bonsai time of trial onsets. Does the first timestamp in the frames file indicate the time of 'intended' first stimulus onset, or is it when the new experiment was started (i.e. with rig.experiment(meta))? Or in other words is the trial number in the frames file column 3 zero on one based?