Open Gigarrum opened 1 year ago
There is a field inside NXattenuator called attenuator_transmission. Considering that the base class is already named as NXattenuator, for the sake of simplicity and less redundancy, won't be better if its name was just transmission?
There is a field inside NXattenuator called attenuator_transmission. Considering that the base class is already named as NXattenuator, for the sake of simplicity and less redundancy, won't be better if its name was just transmission?