Open niekis opened 1 year ago
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
However, I disagree with this issue.
In the add
command, NAME
was used due to the existing context that it would only refer to the athlete being added.
In the mark
command, ATHLETE_NAME
was used because there would be ambiguity if only NAME
was used.
Just NAME
alone could refer to either the athlete's name, or the session's name.
Therefore, ATHLETE_NAME
is used so the user makes sure to input the athlete's name and not the session's name.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: Thanks for the response!
Functionality aside, this still does feel like an inconsistency in the UG, thus the severity: VeryLow.
But even considering functionality, I feel that the add
command could have been made even clearer if NAME
was replaced with ATHLETE_NAME
and that there is no drawback to doing so. There is a small chance that the inconsistency here might cause some confusion in the user.
using
NAME
using
ATHLETE_NAME