I often find myself getting a bit annoyed at just how human unfriendly the hashed parameters are. In many cases, while the set of parameters might be a large dictionary, I can produce a unique string which allows me to identify the exact parameters passed, or it would be useful to just prepend a little information to a hash to make it easier to identify broad groups of tasks.
This PR adds the ability to use a custom hash function, for hashed parameters. This can be as easy as just joining the values of a list parameter with "_".join(x). It is up to the user to ensure that no duplicates are created and that names are of a reasonable length. The default behaviour remains unchanged.
I often find myself getting a bit annoyed at just how human unfriendly the hashed parameters are. In many cases, while the set of parameters might be a large dictionary, I can produce a unique string which allows me to identify the exact parameters passed, or it would be useful to just prepend a little information to a hash to make it easier to identify broad groups of tasks.
This PR adds the ability to use a custom hash function, for hashed parameters. This can be as easy as just joining the values of a list parameter with
"_".join(x). It is up to the user to ensure that no duplicates are created and that names are of a reasonable length. The default behaviour remains unchanged.