In the contributions we should make it super clear what our main contribution is. Right now it kind of looks chaotic. We should only briefly mention sample efficiency. Main highlight should be the problem with MAL objective.
I think it is going to be hard to explain that through trying to combine both papers we actually stumbled on the problem with the objective and the potential implications in other papers. We should rather state the issue with objective first and then explain how we found it. Combining algos should be secondary. Sample efficiency tertiary.
Its going to be very hard to frame everything nicely so it does not feel chaotic.
In the contributions we should make it super clear what our main contribution is. Right now it kind of looks chaotic. We should only briefly mention sample efficiency. Main highlight should be the problem with MAL objective.
I think it is going to be hard to explain that through trying to combine both papers we actually stumbled on the problem with the objective and the potential implications in other papers. We should rather state the issue with objective first and then explain how we found it. Combining algos should be secondary. Sample efficiency tertiary.
Its going to be very hard to frame everything nicely so it does not feel chaotic.