Open perrydv opened 1 month ago
The first item is in @danielturek PR from December.
@perrydv regarding the second time, were you thinking of checking for NA/NaN/non-finite likelihood estimates?
@paciorek I took a look at the second point and I think no change is necessary. The decide
function that ultimately returns the logical for the accept/reject outcome checks for is.na
(which catches both NA
and NaN
), so that should cover the issue already.
PMCMC could be updated to: