Closed oesteban closed 3 years ago
Thanks for this @oesteban! It looks like it should also fix the issues I had with some oblique datasets. Is the old init_enhance_and_skullstrip_dwi_wf
also meant to be replaced with init_brainextraction_wf
from sdcflows?
Is the old
init_enhance_and_skullstrip_dwi_wf
also meant to be replaced withinit_brainextraction_wf
from sdcflows?
I think we should give it a try, at the very least.
This looks good to me! It's going to fail because the eddy nodes are no longer corrected properly.
I'll fix the connections tomorrow (my time). No need to break master for this.
I'll fix the connections tomorrow (my time). No need to break master for this.
Thanks @oesteban. I checked out the reference epi and I don't think it looks like its supposed to.
ugh - I had fixed that already. I'll double-check that the pinned versions of sdcflows and niworkflows are being used.
This is looking better. The JHU1 epiref still looks a little weird but I tested it locally and it was fine there. For the masking reportlet, we are currently showing the unwarped epiref and mask. But should we instead show the epiref and mask before unwarping? The warped mask would be the input to head motion correction.
Hello @oesteban, Thank you for updating!
Cheers! There are no style issues detected in this Pull Request. :beers: To test for issues locally, pip install flake8
and then run flake8 dmriprep
.
Replaces our workflows under
dmriprep.workflows.dwi.util
.