Closed oesteban closed 4 years ago
This looks fantastic :heart_eyes: I'm very much :+1: on bringing in some of these changes.
Let me know if there's anything I can do to help !
I'm on the same page as @emdupre, this looks great (going to have to port this to my projects as well).
I like seeing the explicit rules for publications, on first pass they all look reasonable, would posters fall under the same guidelines? (excluding the recommendation to post to a preprint server)
Also agree, looks good! Let me know how I can help as well.
I like seeing the explicit rules for publications, on first pass they all look reasonable, would posters fall under the same guidelines? (excluding the recommendation to post to a preprint server)
We've been pretty liberal as regards posters and abstracts because pulling together these many people seems to be a block for actually submitting these kinds of work. It's better to disseminate fMRIPrep although sometimes the author list should've been more inclusive. Happy to chat about this and have something written down to clarify.
Probably of particular interest to @emdupre, @ariveradompenciel and @jdkent who have worked on the contributor guidelines in the past.
We've been doing some work on the
CONTRIBUTING.md
file of dMRIPrep, which was initially based on the fMRIPrep's one.But now I believe we could feed in the reversed directions. In particular:
impact:*
andeffort:*
issue labels.WDYT?