njoy / NJOY2016

Nuclear data processing with legacy NJOY
https://www.njoy21.io/NJOY2016
Other
98 stars 86 forks source link

Error encountered while generating ENDF/B-VIII.1 thermal scattering Data with develop branch #349

Open luohao0925 opened 3 weeks ago

luohao0925 commented 3 weeks ago

I encountered an error while attempting to create thermalization data for ENDF/B-VIII.1 using the latest develop branch. Different nuclides are triggering distinct error messages during the process. I have pasted some examples below, and if there are additional nuclides with similar issues, your contributions to this discussion are welcome.

NJOY Version: develop branch (njoy 2016.77 xxSep24) ENDF Version: ENDF/B-VIII.1

Error Messages:

image image

I'm seeking insights on why different nuclides are causing distinct errors during the generation process. Any guidance on resolving these specific issues would be greatly appreciated.

kahlerac commented 3 weeks ago

Be careful about the "ielas" value in your input ... fourth item on acer card 9. Legacy tsl files have used 0 or 1 for coherent elastic or incoherent elastic data but beginning with ENDF/B-VIII.1 some tsls use a "mixed elastic" format and "ielas" needs to be 2 for NJOY to know about this. And since this is a new format you'll need to use MCNP6.3 to properly interpret the resulting ACE file. Skip Kahler

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:05 PM luohao0925 @.***> wrote:

I encountered an error while attempting to create thermalization data for ENDF/B-VIII.1 using the latest develop branch. Different nuclides are triggering distinct error messages during the process. I have pasted some examples below, and if there are additional nuclides with similar issues, your contributions to this discussion are welcome.

NJOY Version: develop branch (njoy 2016.77 xxSep24) ENDF Version: ENDF/B-VIII.1 https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/endf-releases/?version=B-VIII.1

Error Messages:

image.png (view on web) https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c46eeab3-74b3-4c59-97e3-8453245deecd

image.png (view on web) https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b5e33429-a0a3-4619-8c56-f2f2d327f641

image.png (view on web) https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/016cac09-a627-405a-851f-7b56a796d0c3

image.png (view on web) https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/54e2f908-a1a1-416a-ae43-f6d626516250

image.png (view on web) https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e363d92f-7762-4c3b-9ea5-992d103dc763

I'm seeking insights on why different nuclides are causing distinct errors during the generation process. Any guidance on resolving these specific issues would be greatly appreciated.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/njoy/NJOY2016/issues/349, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEHJISMHH3BOZOTEWCN5643Z6GNA5AVCNFSM6AAAAABQ5NSTB6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGYZDKOBXGE4TENQ . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

-- Dr. A. C. (Skip) Kahler Kahler Nuclear Data Services, LLC @.*** +1 321 368 3645

luohao0925 commented 3 weeks ago

Thank you for your response! Your input indeed addressed my inquiries about the "ielas" input since the new "mixed" elastic format. I will try with "ielas" of 2. I truly appreciate your help.