nlitz88 / workzone

Workzone Boundary Detection
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Decide on Interface Format / Message Type Between BEVFusion ROS Node and Workzone Boundary Detection Node #10

Closed nlitz88 closed 6 months ago

nlitz88 commented 9 months ago

Basically, in order to work with the costmap received from the first stage, we may need some kind of parsing code that takes the costmap and converts it into whatever internal representation is desired. I.e., maybe you instantiate a new costmap class and include code internally to create a graph of the constructon objects as an adjacency list.

Of course, the implementation details are up to you--this is just a high level task to track that step in the process if applicable. Feel free to @me and change this up if the plan changes or you have some other ideas :)

nlitz88 commented 6 months ago

Still need to take a little time to figure out what the interface is going to be between the BEVFusion ROS node and the workzone boundary detection node will be.

My guess is that this will (in its most simple form) quite literally just be an image message--especially since that's what we currently have working. Maybe that's what we assume for now and move on with our lives.

Whatever format / interface we decide on, we just have to be prepared to potentially modify/change the BEVFusion ROS node to output messages in this format and then create boundary detection node so that it accepts that same message type.

Some important things to consider:

nlitz88 commented 6 months ago

Okay--for the current pipeline, we are just passing a sensor_msgs/Image Message message from the BEVFusion node to the workzone boundary identification node. Of course, this isn't the only possibility, but is what we will stick with for now for the prototype pipeline.