Review definitions for function parameteres

[Schiano-NOAA]

@kellijohnson-NOAA identified that some descriptions following parameters in the create_template.R function are not sufficient for the user to understand what they are doing. This might be the case for other functions as well in the code. For example, in create_template, the argument parameters and similar arguments are defined as:

https://github.com/nmfs-ost/asar/blob/0be022bb70733835ab60909a00651248d79f0b9c/R/create_template.R#L20-L24

Functions for review:

• [x] create_template
• [x] convert_output
• [x] add_base_section
• [x] add_child
• [x] add_chunk
• [x] add_section
• [ ] add_theme (BLOCK)
• [x] create_citation
• [x] create_figures_doc
• [x] create_title
• [x] export_object
• [x] format_quarto
• [x] utils_tex (no documentation - should be internal)
• [x] utils (no documentation - should be internal)

[Schiano-NOAA]

@sbreitbart-NOAA could you tackle some of these? I would start with add_base_section, add_child, add_chunk, add_section, create_citation. I will begin to review create_template and convert_output, but will request your review for an additional set of eyes afterwards.

Please perform these actions in the dev branch that is opened or a branch from the dev branch that you can later merge into the dev branch. The idea is that I plan to create a new beta release with better documentation, a new working example, and other bug fixes.