Open felix-andreas opened 3 years ago
MichaelMAB2020
commented
3 years ago I wouldn't need it too much: from the beta function it can usually be seen quite good if the quad is focusing or defocusing. But as long as the much denser plots of a MBA cell are not getting overloaded and clearity gets lost, I wouldn't mind.
felix-andreas
commented
3 years ago How it would look like
MichaelMAB2020
commented
3 years ago It is ok but I like the older version more: Q & S to both sides, B shifted according to sign of bending radius.
Maybe one could set a minimum rectangle width to keep the manet visible even though it is really thin - that would help to see the reverse bends easier in this case ...
MichaelMAB2020
commented
3 years ago Didn't we already?
Gr-M
Am 06.06.2021 um 23:32 schrieb Felix Andreas:
@MichaelMAB2020https://github.com/MichaelMAB2020 @PaulGoslawskihttps://github.com/PaulGoslawski
Should we also visualize if if the geometric multipole strength is positive/negative similar to how wolski does it?
(Source Wolski p.100)
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/nobeam/lattice-summaries/issues/1, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO6LKGAII7UTRZEBHZ6ST7DTRPSNBANCNFSM46GNBKSA.
Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH
Mitglied der Hermann von Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren e.V.
Aufsichtsrat: Vorsitzender Dr. Volkmar Dietz, stv. Vorsitzende Dr. Jutta Koch-Unterseher Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Bernd Rech (Sprecher), Prof. Dr. Jan Lüning, Thomas Frederking
Sitz Berlin, AG Charlottenburg, 89 HRB 5583
Postadresse: Hahn-Meitner-Platz 1 14109 Berlin Deutschland
@MichaelMAB2020 @PaulGoslawski
Should we also visualize if if the geometric multipole strength is positive/negative similar to how wolski does it?
(Source Wolski p.100)