codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.10% :warning:
Comparison is base (
b76d545) 83.05% compared to head (bf54157) 82.95%. Report is 17 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #613 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 83.05% 82.95% -0.10% ========================================== Files 105 105 Lines 12587 12588 +1 ========================================== - Hits 10454 10443 -11 - Misses 2133 2145 +12 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/613/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [functional_tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/613/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev) | `65.99% <ø> (-0.03%)` | :arrow_down: | | [functional_tests_config_discovery](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/613/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev) | `45.78% <ø> (-0.17%)` | :arrow_down: | | [unit_tests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/613/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev) | `73.22% <ø> (-0.01%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. [see 3 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/noqdev/iambic/pull/613/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=noqdev):umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
What changed?
Rationale
How was it tested?
If it was manually verified, list the instructions for your reviewers to follow.