Closed joeytalbot closed 1 month ago
Reason for not using oe_get_network()
: it misses The Headrow in Leeds and presumably other busways where cars cannot go: https://github.com/ropensci/osmextract/issues/289
cyclenet now includes highways that are tagged "proposed" and "construction".
construction corridor cycleway path pedestrian primary primary_link 21 14 319 69 80 356 9 proposed residential secondary service tertiary tertiary_link unclassified 1 1980 79 2083 568 8 331
Suggested solution: add that logic around here:
The decision was to stick with osmextract::oe_get()
and to remove roads tagged proposed
and construction
elsewhere. This is complete.
Originally I was using
osmextract::oe_get_network
, with mode specified for either cycling or driving. I'm not sure why this was changed toosmextract::oe_get
. This has removed some of the steps fromosmextract::oe_get_network
that filtered out inappropriate routes. For example, I've noticed that the cyclenet now includes highways that are tagged "proposed" and "construction".It would be best to revert to using
osmextract::oe_get_network
.