Closed nthallen closed 3 years ago
This happens because stale_count is incremented in synch(), which is never called in the non-synchronous mode. Is there any reason why stale_count should not be incremented in Stale() instead?
Fixed in 0411ef2
This happens because stale_count is incremented in synch(), which is never called in the non-synchronous mode. Is there any reason why stale_count should not be incremented in Stale() instead?