Since documentation prompt date format (shown in screenshot) as "2024-11-11", but date format accepted is in "dd/mm/yyyy". Would recommend to indicate in UG command summary that date format expected is "dd/mm/yyyy".
The proper format of dd/mm/yyyy is indicated in both UG and DG with regard to input date formatting. While it is a good to have for it to be shown in the command summary, it is already present in UG.
Since documentation prompt date format (shown in screenshot) as "2024-11-11", but date format accepted is in "dd/mm/yyyy". Would recommend to indicate in UG command summary that date format expected is "dd/mm/yyyy".
[original: nus-cs2113-AY2425S1/pe-interim#23] [original labels: severity.Low type.DocumentationBug]