Open jpmckinney opened 4 years ago
The earlier feedback also suggested having an indication of the number of additional fields (those not covered by OCDS or extensions) on the overview page.
Duncan: number of additional fields. (to get a high level sense of how standardised the data is). Could consider a breakdown of this by stage if others would find that useful? Yohanna: actually I want to see in the overview if there is or not extra fields not declared as extensions
From GitLab:
Also, as I understand, the current check distinguishes between: whether the field is not set at all, and whether it is empty. It is also useful to distinguish (in check result metadata) whether it is
null
, becausenull
has a special meaning in OCDS compared to empty ({}
,[]
,""
).
Related: https://github.com/open-contracting/kingfisher-views/issues/29