Closed duncandewhurst closed 6 months ago
The spell-check failure is addressed by https://github.com/open-contracting/standard/pull/1641
Ah, good spot. I shouldn't have marked #1582 as being closed by this PR. I figure it makes sense to do those other final status date fields when adding the new final status fields in #1160.
Alternatively, we could do all of the final status and final status date fields in this PR. @jpmckinney let me know what you prefer.
My comment in #1583 was to close it "After https://github.com/open-contracting/standard/issues/1160 and https://github.com/open-contracting/standard/issues/1582". #1583 is more like a new feature, whereas #1160 is a major change (#1582 is also more like a new feature). The major change should lead, before related features are implemented.
I prefer to close #1160 on its own. #1582 and #1583 could potentially be combined.
Sounds good! I'll pause work on this PR and prepare a PR for #1160 (PR: https://github.com/open-contracting/standard/pull/1648)
@duncandewhurst This is now unblocked.
I think this is ready for review, unless I missed something.