Closed ColinMaudry closed 7 months ago
The document "Support Process: Review a publication policy" states that extensions should be listed alongside the codelists and codes.
I think it’s enough for the extensions to be listed in the data. If we like, we can make this change in the publication policy template instead.
If we like, we can make this change in the publication policy template instead.
It is part of the publication policy template already.
The latest publication policy guidance doesn't explicitly specify that the OCDS extensions used in the data should be documented in the publication policy.
Is it implied? Or is it enough that the extensions are referenced in the data itself?