There was a discussion among TC members about whether we should require 4 approvals for OTEPs.
Given we want to merge OTEPs into the specification repo, I think it'll be good to improve the spec PR merge criteria. Here is the thinking behind this change:
Having 2 approvals seem good to me, I haven't seen cases where people try to abuse it.
Increasing the number from 2 to 4 will slow down PRs for trivial/editorial changes. Many of the editorial PRs were contributed by first-time contributor to the OpenTelemetry project. I actually think we might want to speed this up rather than slowing it down.
Since the project started, I think the spec maintainers (TC members) have been careful about significant changes, so we make sure people have enough time to review, discuss and share their opinions.
Changes
Clarify that spec maintainers might put additional requirements before merging the PR.
There was a discussion among TC members about whether we should require 4 approvals for OTEPs.
Given we want to merge OTEPs into the specification repo, I think it'll be good to improve the spec PR merge criteria. Here is the thinking behind this change:
Changes
Clarify that spec maintainers might put additional requirements before merging the PR.
For non-trivial changes, follow the change proposal process.
CHANGELOG.md
file updated for non-trivial changesspec-compliance-matrix.md
updated if necessary