Open vbkaisetsu opened 6 months ago
@vbkaisetsu Thanks for pointing out the license. As you say, the current terms of use need to be changed as they deviate from the definition of OSS, and I will remove the Original License section in order to claim it as OSS and to encourage more people to use it.
According to the Open Source Definition:
However, the README includes the following statement:
Therefore, I think this license does not follow the open source definition. Rules for research are to be determined among the researcher community (e.g. learned society), and the OSS license must not restrict use even if the user has done something that violates research ethics.
In my opinion, in order to conform to the OSS definition, it would be better to remove the Original License section from the license and only encourage proper citation in the Citation section.