Open andrico1234 opened 1 month ago
Name | Link |
---|---|
Latest commit | 2defbc0d74c51dbd58c7c9de39921f8e36ce728e |
Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/custom-elements-manifest-analyzer/deploys/664f7110a722930008bbf13a |
Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-258--custom-elements-manifest-analyzer.netlify.app |
Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
Heya, just wanted to get your thoughts on this, whether there's anything you'd like me to clarify or change :)
~Note: I added a test case to simulate the bad scenario, but it seems to work even with the old regex.~
The test case now fails using the old regex pattern, but the set up for the test is complex. I worry that it pollutes the top-level package.json file.
What do you think? Happy to remove the test if you feel it best
Resolves: https://github.com/open-wc/custom-elements-manifest/issues/256