search

openENTRANCE / openentrance

Definitions of common terms (variables, regions, etc.) for the openENTRANCE project
http://openentrance.eu
Apache License 2.0
30 stars 49 forks source link

additional WP1 - task 1.3 scenarios #238

Closed Renato-Rodrigues closed 1 year ago

danielhuppmann commented 1 year ago

Just for double-checking - other scenarios names have an identifier "WP2". Are we sure that these names do not need a WP identifier?

Renato-Rodrigues commented 1 year ago

Just for double-checking - other scenarios names have an identifier "WP2". Are we sure that these names do not need a WP identifier?

These are the scenario names defined in the WP1 scenarios protocol from ECEMF. As far as I understand, they do not include the specific WP tag because the scenarios protocol is shared openly. This is the same case of the previously defined diagnosis scenario. The aim is to allow other models that do not participate in the project to create the same scenarios for comparison. Therefore, including the WP tag (e.g. WP1) would lose meaning in this context, as these scenarios use is not limited to the working package work only.

danielhuppmann commented 1 year ago

ok, thanks for the clarification!