Closed lzehl closed 4 years ago
Just use the IRI so that it is open. That way you can detect that the IRI has not been in ingested into KG.
:+1: @UlrikeS91 once we go over the schemas again (also in openminds) let's just double check that this decision is implemented.
👍 @UlrikeS91 once we go over the schemas again (also in openminds) let's just double check that this decision is implemented.
Okay, I'll probably go over most of the SANDS schemas today. Then I'll change the format back to IRI (instead of URI).
Decided for IRI based on some discussion related to openMINDS as well. Can be closed
@tgbugs : what entry type do we want to have for
relatedOntology
property? Please see below for the more detailed questionsWhat was the previous way / what was discussed: A) current status in the KG:
relatedOntology
property expects$ref
to KG ontology JSON-LD (specific type, e.g.ontologies/core/organism/v1.0.0/xxx
)relatedOntology
property expects IRI/URI to ontological term (does this exist?) or the ontological identifier (is this enough for finding it)?relatedOntology
property entry would be indirect (but automatically established) using the IRI/URI or the ontological identifier (see questions above)@tgbugs: 1) Would you prefer A) over B) or B) over A)? 2) If you prefer B) would the entry be an IRI/URI or the ontological identifier? 2.1) Could you give an example how these entries look like (what to expect / how to find them)?