openMetadataInitiative / openMINDS_SANDS

A metadata model capturing Spatial Anchoring of Neuroscience Data Structures, including brain atlas definitions.
MIT License
12 stars 11 forks source link

Entry type for "relatedOntology" #44

Closed lzehl closed 4 years ago

lzehl commented 4 years ago

@tgbugs : what entry type do we want to have for relatedOntology property? Please see below for the more detailed questions

What was the previous way / what was discussed: A) current status in the KG:

@tgbugs: 1) Would you prefer A) over B) or B) over A)? 2) If you prefer B) would the entry be an IRI/URI or the ontological identifier? 2.1) Could you give an example how these entries look like (what to expect / how to find them)?

tgbugs commented 4 years ago

Just use the IRI so that it is open. That way you can detect that the IRI has not been in ingested into KG.

lzehl commented 4 years ago

:+1: @UlrikeS91 once we go over the schemas again (also in openminds) let's just double check that this decision is implemented.

UlrikeS91 commented 4 years ago

👍 @UlrikeS91 once we go over the schemas again (also in openminds) let's just double check that this decision is implemented.

Okay, I'll probably go over most of the SANDS schemas today. Then I'll change the format back to IRI (instead of URI).

UlrikeS91 commented 4 years ago

Decided for IRI based on some discussion related to openMINDS as well. Can be closed