Closed NicolasRouquette closed 2 years ago
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
rdfs:Literal is included in the list of IRIs in section 2.4: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#IRIs
rdfs:Literal
Furthermore, the datatype section explicitly refers to rdfs:Literal: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Datatypes
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
A clear and concise description of what should be the expected behavior.
Enter any other details such as dependencies, environment, examples, etc.
If applicable, add screenshots to help illustrate the issue.
I added rdfs:Literal to the rdfs ontology: https://github.com/opencaesar/core-vocabularies/blob/159faeca9f10a7078b5efa08ef79b526f980d38a/src/oml/www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema.oml#L17
Description
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
rdfs:Literal
is included in the list of IRIs in section 2.4: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#IRIsFurthermore, the datatype section explicitly refers to
rdfs:Literal
: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#DatatypesSteps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected Behavior
A clear and concise description of what should be the expected behavior.
Additional Context
Enter any other details such as dependencies, environment, examples, etc.
Relevant screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help illustrate the issue.