Open denizzzka opened 5 months ago
Shouldn't it be lodc2 instead of oldc2?
ldc2 = LLVM D compiler 2 oldc2 = open LLVM D compiler 2 lodc2 = LLVM openD compiler 2
Do we need the 2 in the end ?
will have to update the github action too to call the right one and copy the right one..... maybe we should only edit the name in the binary release package instead of the whole thing....
the 2 is probably not really needed here btw, that was to differentiate between D1 and D2 and D1 is quite dead now.
@IgorDeepakM don't know, can change to any other
I am only worrying about mess with original ldc2 because Meson obviously isn't supports opend
I am only worrying about mess with original ldc2 because Meson obviously isn't supports opend
Yes, that is risk and also any plugins like code-D for VSCode.
Anyway, I'm good with any of the alternatives but just get rid of the 2 because we aren't making sequel .... wait are we?
It's no hurry for me but I think we should have a distinctive compiler names for the release so that they don't interfere with the old D compiler.
Ok, lodc
, because oldc sounds like "old c"
...but does not touches cmake config file names