Open ghobona opened 9 months ago
The following steps need to be completed to close this GitHub Issue.
The namespaces you point out are the function and rule namespaces which have already been registered since GeoSPARQL 1.0 and which are also used in the funcsrules TTL file. Should we create one TTL file per namespace, i.e. one TTL file for http://www.opengis.net/def/function/geosparql and one for http://www.opengis.net/def/rule/geosparql instead of creating a joint file for both called funcsrules.ttl?
@ghobona is there a problem rendering certain function URIs in the GeoSPARQL spec? I just tried to resolve https://defs.opengis.net/vocprez/object?uri=http://www.opengis.net/def/function/geosparql/minZ the minZ function and even though it is classified as a skos:Concept, vocprez returns the error messages that the function is no skos:Concept. Any ideas?
Now it's ok: shows on VocPrez, and has
@prefix ns2: <https://w3id.org/function/ontology#> .
<http://www.opengis.net/def/function/geosparql/minZ> a skos:Concept,
<http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description#Function>,
ns2:Function ;
A bit related to #467?
There are some URI inconsistencies between Standards document and URIs submitted to the OGC-NA. An example is shown on the attached screenshot.
This suggests that once the URIs submitted to the OGC-NA are agreed upon and registered, the Standards document should then be updated to match them.