search

opengeospatial / unggim_standards_guide

1 stars 3 forks source link

Does this repository match the published version? #14

Open PeterParslow opened 1 month ago

PeterParslow commented 1 month ago

The repository's readme says

"This version is based upon Edition 3 Draft, in which Review/comments were invited by 31 October 2021. "

The published version (https://standards.unggim.ogc.org/index.php) is Edition 3.0.0:2022-01-01.

If we publish again from this repository, will we lose whatever changed between the October 2021 draft and the January 2022 publication?

I've tried looking at some bits, and not all look the same. For example, the Appendix titles at https://standards.unggim.ogc.org/index.php are different to those in the adoc files in https://github.com/opengeospatial/unggim_standards_guide/tree/main/Appendices - but I'm not sure those files are used in the published online guide, where the appendices are linked spreadsheets rather than HTML files.

ogcscotts commented 1 month ago

request for republication has been made

PeterParslow commented 1 month ago

request for republication has been made

https://standards.unggim.ogc.org/unggim_guide.html still has "ISO 19169" for API Features...

ogcscotts commented 1 month ago

published: https://standards.unggim.ogc.org/index.php

PeterParslow commented 1 month ago

Looks good. Which can't be said of the PDF version which is linked & contains the corrections, but also contains a lot of unprocessed HTML tags in places. That should perhaps be a new issue "some HTML tags not handled in PDF publishing"?

PeterParslow commented 2 weeks ago

@ogcscotts : is there anything we (you, Greg?) can do about the html tags in the PDF?

ogcscotts commented 2 weeks ago

@gbuehler does Asciidoctor-pdf have a problem with HTML tags that include the window="_blank" modifier?