[PRE REVIEW]: An Introduction to Applied Bioinformatics: a free, open, and interactive text.

[whedon]

Submitting author: @gregcaporaso (James Gregory Caporaso) Repository: https://github.com/caporaso-lab/An-Introduction-To-Applied-Bioinformatics/blob/master/paper.md Version: 0.1.3-dev Editor: @tracykteal Reviewers: @AstrobioMike

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSE @gregcaporaso. The JOSE editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

@gregcaporaso if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSE and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSE submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks. @tracykteal it looks like you're currently assigned as the editor for this paper :tada:

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #23 with the following error:

/app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/find.rb:43:in block in find': No such file or directory (Errno::ENOENT) from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/find.rb:43:incollect!' from /app/vendor/ruby-2.3.4/lib/ruby/2.3.0/find.rb:43:in find' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/lib/whedon/processor.rb:57:infind_paper_paths' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/bin/whedon:32:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:inrun' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:indispatch' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/bin/whedon:99:in<top (required)>' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bin/whedon:22:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bin/whedon:22:in

'

[labarba]

@tracykteal This submission is squarely on your field. Given the extent of the materials, I suggest you find three reviewers and divvy up the content for them to review. All could check installation, and so on, but could focus on just a section of the content.

[tracykteal]

Thanks, I can be editor and good suggestion to divide up the review.

[tracykteal]

@whedon assign @tracykteal as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @tracykteal

[tracykteal]

Thanks @gregcaporaso for the submission. Excited to see it here.

[tracykteal]

@astrobiomike would you be available to review? We can divide the content into sections for the pedagogy/content, so perhaps you could pick a section to review.

[AstrobioMike]

@tracykteal

Absolutely! Looking forward to it :) I'll post here with thoughts on specific section(s) after I get to look over things more closely

[gregcaporaso]

@tracykteal, would it be possible to get a status update on this? It looks like review hasn't started yet - is that accurate?

[labarba]

@whedon assign @AstrobioMike as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @AstrobioMike

[labarba]

@tracykteal You were looking for a second reviewer for this submission, correct? Once you identify one, use @whedon add @username as reviewer and then start the review (that way you get two checklists in the review issue, automatically).

[gregcaporaso]

Hi @tracykteal and @labarba, has review started for this manuscript? Thanks for the update.

[tracykteal]

@AstrobioMike submitted a review via email. Sorry, I needed to trigger the start of the review, so it could be completed here. Doing that now.

[tracykteal]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/jose-reviews/issues/27. Feel free to close this issue now!