[PRE REVIEW]: RapidHRV: An Open-Source Toolbox for Extracting Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability

[whedon]

Submitting author: @peterakirk (Peter Kirk) Repository: https://github.com/peterakirk/rapidhrv Version: v0.1.5 Editor: Pending Reviewer: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @peterakirk. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@peterakirk if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

:warning: JOSS reduced service mode :warning:

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.03 s (288.2 files/s, 36221.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                           4            100            102            345
TeX                              1             22              0            244
Markdown                         3             88              0            224
TOML                             1              0              0              6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             9            210            102            819
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statistical information for the repository 'bb757cf56b609d105c6c0144' was
gathered on 2021/04/30.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Peter Kirk                       3           829            287           85.00
peterakirk                       7           101             96           15.00

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Peter Kirk                  479           57.8          0.0               10.02
peterakirk                   68           67.3          0.4                2.94

[whedon]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116072 is OK
- 10.2478/folmed-2018-0012 is OK
- 10.1109/ICNF.2017.7985971 is OK
- 10.3389/fmed.2020.597774 is OK
- 10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.015 is OK
- 10.1098/rstb.2019.0271 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 is OK
- 10.1093/europace/eus341 is OK
- 10.1017/S003329171600060X is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/3ewgz is OK
- 10.3390/s19143079 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4669042 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@whedon query scope

[whedon]

Submission flagged for editorial review.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@peterakirk I've flagged this submission for editorial scope review. This is typical for submissions of this size. This scope review should take about a week.

[peterakirk]

Submitting author: @peterakirk (Peter Kirk) Repository: https://github.com/peterakirk/rapidhrv Version: v0.1.5 Editor: Pending Reviewer: Pending Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

warning JOSS reduced service mode warning

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @peterakirk. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@peterakirk if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

Hi @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman,

Thank you for processing the submission. We can suggest four potential reviewers:

Mohamed Elgendi (moe.elgendi@gmail.com): Expert in computer engineering, signal processing, cardiac arrhythmias, and developer of PPGSynth, the MATLAB toolbox used for the simulation of photoplethysmography cardiac data in our validation tests.

Daniel Quintana (daniel.quintana@psykologi.uio.no): Expert in psychiatry and heart rate variability. Open science advocate.

Torben Noto (TorbenNoto2024@u.northwestern.edu): Expert in psychophysiological monitoring and developer of BreathMetrics, a signal processing toolbox dedicated to peak detection in respiration.

Micah Allen (micah@aias.au.dk): Expert in brain-body interactions and developer of Systole, a software for the analysis of heart rate variability in pulse oximetry data.

Best, Pete

[kthyng]

Hi @peterakirk and thank you for your submission. Unfortunately the editorial board has determined that it is too small in scope to pass our substantial scholarly effort bar. If your software expands in size or is combined with another package, we would be happy to reconsider it in the future. Alternatively, there are a few other ideas for publishing your software to get a citation for people when using your software. Thank you.

[kthyng]

@whedon reject

[whedon]

Paper rejected.