[PRE REVIEW]: ProgPy: Python Packages for Prognostics and Health Management of Engineering Systems

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@teubert<!--end-author-handle-- (Chris Teubert) Repository: https://github.com/nasa/prog_models Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper Version: v1.4.5 Editor: !--editor-->@kellyrowland<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @matthewjdaigle, @tbsexton Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/86cc587435ae9f766eb67e0b22d49a67"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/86cc587435ae9f766eb67e0b22d49a67/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/86cc587435ae9f766eb67e0b22d49a67/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/86cc587435ae9f766eb67e0b22d49a67)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @teubert. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@teubert if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.26 s (535.2 files/s, 144360.2 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      12           2769           3087          11446
Python                          80           2196           3692           8265
CSS                              5            392             76           1505
HTML                             8            282              0           1349
YAML                             8             55             68            297
Markdown                         8             76              0            293
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0            784            181
TeX                              1              8              0             55
reStructuredText                14             17             17             40
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           137           5795           7724          23431
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1142

[editorialbot]

:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- 10.36001/ijphm.2017.v8i2.2618 may be a valid DOI for title: A Generic Software Architecture for Prognostics (GSAP)
- 10.36001/phmconf.2022.v14i1.3238 may be a valid DOI for title: Enabling in-time prognostics with surrogate modeling through physics-enhanced Dynamic Mode Decomposition method

INVALID DOIs

- None

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot invite @kellyrowland as editor

Hi @kellyrowland, I realize this is a bit outside your area, but could you edit this submission?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[kellyrowland]

Hi @kyleniemeyer 👋 I would be happy to take this on. I am out of office next week (Jan 16 - 20) but can reach out to potential reviewers today or tomorrow.

[teubert]

Hello @kellyrowland: Thank you for agreeing to be the editor for our subscription. Let me know if you need anything from us.

In the meantime, can I suggest Matthew Daigle (github username: matthewjdaigle) from Novity as a reviewer? He's had a lot of experience developing software in this field, so he would be able to provide that perspective to the review process.

[kellyrowland]

@teubert thanks for the recommendation, I'll ping Matthew once I've been 'formally' assigned as editor here. Reviewer suggestions are pretty much the extent of things for the moment, but feel free to give me a shout with any questions or concerns.

[kyleniemeyer]

Hi @kyleniemeyer 👋 I would be happy to take this on. I am out of office next week (Jan 16 - 20) but can reach out to potential reviewers today or tomorrow.

No problem, thanks!

[kyleniemeyer]

@editorialbot assign @kellyrowland as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @kellyrowland is now the editor

[kellyrowland]

Hi @matthewjdaigle 👋 would you be available for and interested in reviewing this JOSS submission?

[kellyrowland]

Hi @tbsexton @thermalogic 👋 would you be available for and interested in reviewing this JOSS submission?

[rtbs-dev]

@kellyrowland definitely! Thanks for the mention; what's the timeline for these reviews, again?

[kellyrowland]

@tbsexton great, thanks! We aim for reviews to be completed within about 2-4 weeks, but that's not a hard deadline.

[matthewjdaigle]

Yes, I'm available. I'll complete the review this week.

Matt

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023, 11:23 AM Kelly L. Rowland @.***> wrote:

Hi @matthewjdaigle https://github.com/matthewjdaigle 👋 would you be available for and interested in reviewing this JOSS submission?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5070#issuecomment-1382287016, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFASKBCV5ILJC7UMXHXAXHLWSGTS3ANCNFSM6AAAAAATYULQUQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[kellyrowland]

@matthewjdaigle thanks very much!

[kellyrowland]

@editorialbot add @matthewjdaigle as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@matthewjdaigle added to the reviewers list!

[kellyrowland]

@editorialbot add @tbsexton as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@tbsexton added to the reviewers list!

[kellyrowland]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/5099.