Open editorialbot opened 7 months ago
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.14 s (255.7 files/s, 30149.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 18 439 824 2407
Markdown 4 58 0 146
TeX 1 10 0 106
YAML 2 7 10 42
DOS Batch 1 8 1 27
reStructuredText 7 28 27 27
PowerShell 1 2 151 14
make 1 4 6 10
Bourne Shell 1 0 1 7
JSON 1 0 0 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 37 556 1020 2787
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 842
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109529 is OK
- 10/gpjrzf is OK
- 10/gqg5d6 is OK
- 10/gh4vsp is OK
- 10/gfx7zs is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_2 may be a valid DOI for title: Scribble2Label: Scribble-Supervised Cell Segmentation via Self-Generating Pseudo-Labels with Consistency
- 10.1109/embc.2017.8036826 may be a valid DOI for title: Individual muscle segmentation in MR images: A 3D propagation through 2D non-linear registration approaches
INVALID DOIs
- None
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Hi @likeajumprope, Just wanted to give you a quick update. I'm still waiting for the changes for the updates requested above. I will resume my review once the changes have been made by the author. Please let me know if anything else is needed.
Hello.The requested updates have been taken into account in the v1.2.2 release.
Hi @likeajumprope, Review completed from my end. Please let me know if anything else is needed.
@WangKehan573, how is it going? Is there anything I could assist you with?
Hi @likeajumprope, Review completed from my end. Please let me know if anything else is needed.
Thank you a lot @animikhaich
Hi @WangKehan573, how is the status of the review? Is there anything I could assist you with? I have also reached out to you per email :)
@likeajumprope have you heard back over email?
Hello. I still haven't received any feedback. It seems that the second reviewer @WangKehan573 is simply no longer available. If this is really the case, what would be the next step? Thank you all for your time.
Hello. I still haven't received any feedback. It seems that the second reviewer @WangKehan573 is simply no longer available. If this is really the case, what would be the next step? Thank you all for your time.
Yes, seems like this is the case. I will find another reviewer
Hello, is there any news about the review?
Hello, is there any news about the review?
I am working on it - updates to follow soon
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@nathandecaux<!--end-author-handle-- (Nathan Decaux) Repository: https://github.com/nathandecaux/labelprop Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Version: v1.2 Editor: !--editor-->@likeajumprope<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @WangKehan573, @animikhaich Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@WangKehan573 & @animikhaich, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review. First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @likeajumprope know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
📝 Checklist for @animikhaich