Closed editorialbot closed 7 months ago
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88 T=0.14 s (536.6 files/s, 63409.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python 32 832 827 2488
reStructuredText 17 161 101 498
YAML 20 45 34 467
Jupyter Notebook 4 0 2786 289
TeX 1 17 0 283
make 1 24 5 125
Markdown 1 13 0 81
TOML 1 2 0 21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 77 1094 3753 4252
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository
Wordcount for paper.md
is 679
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1017/pasa.2012.007 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f is OK
- 10.1017/pasa.2019.21 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad3849 is OK
- 10.1088/1538-3873/129/974/045001 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stv571 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stx2118 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/sty796 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stz3138 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/756/2/165 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-6256/145/3/65 is OK
- 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/66 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stw1310 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2401.04174 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- 10.22323/1.215.0012 may be a valid DOI for title: Cosmology from EoR/Cosmic Dawn with the SKA
INVALID DOIs
- None
@steven-murray — Thanks for your submission! All the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!
:point_right::page_facing_up: Download article proof :page_facing_up: View article proof on GitHub :page_facing_up: :point_left:
Five most similar historical JOSS papers:
21cmFAST v3: A Python-integrated C code for generating 3D realizations of the cosmic 21cm signal.
Submitting author: @steven-murray
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @sambit-giri, @sultan-hassan
Similarity score: 0.8720
The Python Sky Model 3 software
Submitting author: @zonca
Handling editor: @christinahedges (Retired)
Reviewers: @patricialarsen, @smsharma
Similarity score: 0.8408
Simulating instrumental systematics of Cosmic Microwave Background experiments with s4cmb
Submitting author: @JulienPeloton
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @Christovis, @changhoonhahn
Similarity score: 0.8286
SALSA: A Python Package for Constructing Synthetic Quasar Absorption Line Catalogs from Astrophysical Hydrodynamic Simulations
Submitting author: @biboyd
Handling editor: @danielskatz (Active)
Reviewers: @olebole, @zpace
Similarity score: 0.8258
The Pulsar Signal Simulator: A Python package for simulating radio signal data from pulsars
Submitting author: @Hazboun6
Handling editor: @mbobra (Active)
Reviewers: @JBorrow, @arjunsavel
Similarity score: 0.8225
⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.
@dfm thank you!
@editorialbot assign me as editor
@dfm – I can take this.
Assigned! @arfon is now the editor
@steven-murray thanks for your submission to JOSS – could you take a look a this list of potential reviewers and identify a few people who would be good candidates to review this submission?
@Hazboun6 @JulienPeloton @zonca :wave: would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is 21cmSense v2: A modular, open-source 21 cm sensitivity calculator
Based on your experience, and past submissions as authors here @ JOSS, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!
Many thanks Arfon
@steven-murray thanks for your submission to JOSS – could you take a look a this list of potential reviewers and identify a few people who would be good candidates to review this submission?
@steven-murray – I need your help here please.
Hi @arfon -- sorry I missed your earlier comments!
I just took a look through the list, and here's a few possible candidates: @JohannesBuchner , @astrophpeter, @htjb , @changhoonhahn , @sambit-giri , @astrom-tom , @williamjameshandley , @mattpitkin (sorry for the spam notices!)
I'm happy to review this.
@mattpitkin – amazing, thank you! I'll go ahead and add you as a reviewer now, and then start the review once we have a second reviewer (which won't be too long I hope). Does that sound OK?
@editorialbot add @mattpitkin as reviewer
@mattpitkin added to the reviewers list!
@arfon @steven-murray also happy to review if you still need another.
@editorialbot add @htjb as reviewer
@htjb added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/6501.
@mattpitkin, @htjb, @steven-murray – see you over in #6501 where the actual review will take place.
Submitting author: !--author-handle-->@steven-murray<!--end-author-handle-- (Steven Murray) Repository: https://github.com/rasg-affiliates/21cmSense Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): joss-paper Version: v2.0.0 Editor: !--editor-->@arfon<!--end-editor-- Reviewers: @mattpitkin, @htjb Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @steven-murray. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@steven-murray if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type: